Meet Protégé™ in PatentSight+, your source for AI-powered patent insights. Learn More

Get IP Insights Through Clean, Trusted Patent Data

Make confident, data-driven decisions with LexisNexis® Intellectual Property Solutions

What is your patent data missing?

Get a one-page overview of how LexisNexis® Intellectual Property Solutions harmonizes patent data across 17.6M+ active patent families, 24K+ ultimate owners, and 80+ patent authorities—backed by expert review and weekly updates.

Incomplete ownership information

Subsidiaries, historic names, or inventors often appear in place of the true ultimate owner, hiding the real competitive landscape.

Patents may lapse, be reassigned, or invalidated long before their 20-year term, making it unclear who truly controls the rights.

Name variations and translation errors

Misspellings, transliterations, and homonyms lead to fragmented or duplicated ownership records.

Relying on unharmonized data can result in misjudged valuations, flawed benchmarks, and billion-dollar missteps.

What we do to make patent data more reliable

Our multi‑stage harmonization combines automation with expert human review to deliver trusted patent ownership data you can act on.

Watch how harmonization maps true ownership across jurisdictions and time.

Wide coverage. A fuller picture.

95M

Patent families and other IP rights in PatentSight+
(Data as of August 2026)

17.6M+

Active patent families
(Data as of August 2026)

80+

Patent authorities covered

24K+

Ultimate owners in PatentSight+

1,100+

M&A activities tracked in 2025

  • Global scale with local expertise – A dedicated team of more than 10 experienced researchers from many nationalities reviews patent documents in their original national languages to verify data accuracy.
  • Breadth and depth – More than 95 million patent families and other IP rights in LexisNexis® PatentSight+™ ™️ (Data as of Aug 2026), including over 17.6 million active patent families, are harmonized through a combination of proprietary algorithms and expert review.
  • Trusted coverage – Data is sourced from the EPO’s DOCDB (80+ authorities), INPADOC (50+ authorities), national patent registers (40+ authorities) and litigation data, and is updated and harmonized every week. Indian bibliographic records are sourced from the Indian Patent Office through a third-party data provider and integrated into the PatentSight+ data foundation. See our PatentSight+ and LexisNexis® PatentSight+™ Dataset coverage overview for details. 
  • Corporate ownership clarity – Over 24,000 ultimate owners are mapped in PatentSight+, with patents filed by subsidiaries assigned to their ultimate commercial owner using corporate structure databases, patent register information and primary research. Supported Indian assignees are linked to global Ultimate Owner structures. Mapping does not cover every Indian assignee. Ownership mapping for Indian assignees, particularly for India-only inventions, will continue to be extended after release.
  • M&A and reassignment monitoring – In 2025 alone, our team tracked over 1,100 announced M&A activities, and completed deals are reflected in portfolios and corporate trees in near real-time.

Get a one-page overview of how LexisNexis® Intellectual Property Solutions harmonizes patent data across 17.6M+ active patent families, 24K+ ultimate owners, and 80+ patent authorities—backed by expert review and weekly updates.

Our approach to correcting ownership information

Every inconsistency in patent records can distort analytics, due diligence, and strategic decisions. Our process includes:

Subsidiaries to parent companies

Patents filed under subsidiaries are linked back to the ultimate headquarters, so benchmarking reflects the corporate owner.

Historical company names

Name changes and legacy brands are reconciled, following portfolios across decades.

Mergers & Acquisitions

Both historic and ongoing M&A events are captured in near real time, to attribute new ownership.

Patent Transactions

Patent Transactions

Sales and reassignments are tracked near continuously, keeping portfolios aligned with the current rights holder.

Misspellings and Variations

Misspellings and variations

Inconsistencies across patent office records are standardized, reducing false positives and data fragmentation.

Homonyms and Translations

Homonyms and translations

Same names are used by multiple distinct companies and universities.

Patent Data Quality Handbook
Female scientist analyzing medical sample in test tube. Young researcher is wearing lab coat. She is concentrating while working in laboratory.

Why patent data quality matters

Trusted data for high-stakes decisions 

Bring audit‑ready IP metrics in front of executives and investors. The same harmonized datasets that power our platforms also support boardroom discussions, investor communications, and regulatory filings, so results are transparent, explainable, and defensible when the stakes are highest. Our verification spans ultimate ownership, legal status, and standardized bibliographic fields, backed by large‑scale automation and expert curation. 

The same trusted data that underpins our platforms is used in litigation, licensing negotiations, and regulatory disclosures. It is auditable, transparent, and defensible—giving leaders the confidence to rely on it in investor communications, sustainability reports, and executive decision-making. 

See how companies are bringing IP into the boardroom with trusted LexisNexis data

Explore how trusted IP data builds confidence in the boardroom: 

Test Video Transcript

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

More Resources

5 Consequences Of Patent Data Errors: The Applicant Name Field

5 Consequences of Patent Data Errors: The Applicant Name Field

Patent data quality is crucial for ensuring reliable analytics. In this blogpost we discuss five consequences of patent data errors.

Data And Decisions: The Risks In Relying On Inaccurate Patent Data

Data and Decisions: The Risks in Relying on Inaccurate Patent Data

If organizations base critical business decisions on inaccurate patent data, they may experience negative business results.

6 Common Patent Data Errors and How they Affect your Decisions

6 Common Patent Data Errors and How They Affect Your Decisions

We explored the impact of common patent data errors in one of the most problematic fields for patent data: the applicant name field.